Assessing dosing errors in legacy and low dose tip ENFit® syringes.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: To avoid misconnections between different medical devices, a unique standardized design of connectors (ENFit® ) for enteral medical devices has been developed. It was expected that the syringes with these connectors will replace the pre-existing syringes, henceforth referred to as legacy syringes. However, the changes in the connector's design led to concerns regarding dosing errors for low volume syringes (≤2 ml). Therefore, novel low dose tip (LDT) syringes were designed to address these concerns. These LDT syringes can connect with the standardized ENFit® male connectors. Only a few studies have investigated dosing errors, and findings have largely been mixed. The objective of this report was to calculate the contributions of unavoidable dosing errors for LDT syringes, compare with legacy syringes and to suggest strategies to optimize dose accuracy for enteral applications. METHODS: Studies performed with a limited number of syringes to date may not reflect the actual diversity of dosing error that can occur across syringe orientations, batches, manufacturers, medications, etc. A computer-aided design software SolidWorks® was used to calculate the dosing errors in 0.5 and 1.0 ml legacy syringe connectors and were compared with dosing errors in LDT syringe connectors with the same nominal volume. Influence of orientation during delivery, spillage and flushing on dosing error was also investigated. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: For 0.5 and 1.0 ml LDT syringes, in absence of medication in the moat area, the maximum dosing error will be ±5% when delivering 100% of nominal volume, which is also equal to the dosing error in 0.5 and 1.0 ml slip tip legacy syringes. However, with medication present in moat area, and with syringe reused during flushing, the LDT dosing error can range from 1% to 18% and 28% to 35% for 1.0 and 0.5 ml syringes, respectively. The corresponding dosing error for legacy syringes would be when the same syringe is used for flushing or when syringe disengages pointing vertically up. The corresponding dosing errors for legacy syringes could range from -7 to 12% and -9% to 19% for 1.0 and 0.5 ml syringes, respectively. Dosing errors for legacy and LDT syringes increase as the nominal capacity of syringe reduces, or when the dose delivered is lower than the nominal capacity of the syringe. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: For LDT syringes, dosing errors can be reduced by clearing the moat area of the syringe and by using a new syringe for flushing post-delivery of medication. For legacy syringes, dosing errors can be minimized by ensuring the female connector points up during disengagement from the syringe post-medication administration, and by using a new syringe for flushing.

Technical considerations for medical device manufacturers when designing gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) using the new ISO 80369-3 connector.

BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are typically used when people cannot eat food by mouth. The connector section that allows G-tubes to connect to other devices, such as feeding sets or syringes, has been modified on some of the devices to reduce misconnections in hospital settings. The narrow internal diameter of the new connector, standardized under ISO 80369-3, has caused some users to express concern about a reduced flow rate. Previous studies performed on commercial devices determined that it was not conclusive how much the ISO 80369-3 connector contributed towards the reduced flow rate, because when manufacturers designed these new connector-based devices, they often changed other geometric variables (such as distal tube diameter, or length) at the same time. Thus, it became difficult isolating the effect of the connector from other geometric variables. METHOD: The key objective of this study was to investigate how different design variables impacted the flow rate through the G-tubes. 3D-printed devices were used to assess the geometric parameters in a systematic manner. Commercial diets and Newtonian analog fluids with matched viscosities were used for testing. RESULTS: The flow path length of the "transition section" encompassing the standardized ISO 80369-3 connector in the new devices was found to cause reduced flow. Additionally, results showed that a shortened (≤ 10 mm) transition section, along with a 10% increase in the distal inner diameter of large bore devices (e.g., 24 Fr), can restore flow rates to levels consistent with the previous devices prior to the connector standardization. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy for restoring flow rates to previous levels may help alleviate concerns raised by multiple stakeholders such as health care professionals, patients, caregivers and device manufacturers. In addition, the approach proposed here can be used as a tool for designing future G-tube devices.

Impact of Design Changes in Gastrostomy Tube (G-tube) Devices for Patients Who Rely on Home-Based Blenderized Diets for Enteral Nutrition.

OBJECTIVE: Blenderized diets are gaining increasing popularity among enteral tube users. Connectors in gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are undergoing standardization to reduce misconnections. These standardized G-tubes are referred to as ENFit G-tubes. This study was performed to quantify the in vitro performance of existing (legacy) G-tubes and compare them with ENFit G-tubes for blenderized diets. METHOD: Patient blenderized diet recipes and practices were obtained through patient advocacy groups. Different blenders and blending times were studied. Five legacy G-tube brands and three corresponding ENFit brands, sized between 14 Fr and 24 Fr, were studied under gravity and push modes of feeding. RESULTS: Considering both thin and thick blenderized gravity mode diets, an average increase in feeding time from 20 minutes to 32 ± 18 minutes in transitioning from legacy to ENFit was observed with standard G-tubes, compared to 22 ± 3.5 minutes for low profiles. For push-mode diets, a 60-second push with standard ENFit G-tubes was easier compared to standard legacy G-tubes (61% ± 21% as much force), but faster 5-second pushes required considerably more effort for ENFit standard G-tubes (167% ± 96%). Low-profile ENFit G-tubes required slightly less effort compared to low-profile legacies for both 60-second and 5-second pushes (72% ± 22% and 90% ± 19%, respectively). Clogging was common in both legacy and ENFit devices, particularly under gravity mode. CONCLUSIONS: For a push mode of feeding, patients will largely be unimpacted after the transition to ENFit. For a gravity mode of feeding, some ENFit users may need higher-powered blenders and should expect increased feeding times.

The Regulatory Perspectives on Endoscopic Devices for Obesity.

The recent increase in US Food and Drug Administration-approved weight-loss devices has diversified obesity treatment options. The regulatory pathways for endoscopically placed weight-loss devices and considerations for clinical trials are discussed, including the benefit-risk paradigm intended to aid in weight-loss-device trial development. Also discussed is the benefit-risk analysis of recently approved endoscopic devices. A strategic priority of the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health is to increase the use of patient input in decision making. Thus, we consider how endoscopic weight-loss devices with profiles similar to those that have been approved may be viewed in a patient preference study.

Platelet reactivity and thrombogenicity in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Age-adjusted incidence of cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction, is significantly lower in premenopausal women than in men, which is thought to be caused by the cardioprotective effects of estrogen. However, there is a consistent increase in the incidence of coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women in comparison with premenopausal women. The protective benefit of hormone therapy has not been observed in postmenopausal women. It is unknown whether measures of platelet reactivity and clot strength contribute to the disproportionate incidence of cardiovascular disease between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. METHODS: Fifty healthy volunteers, including 25 premenopausal women and 25 postmenopausal women, aged between 40 and 65 years were enrolled. Total estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were measured for confirmation of menopausal state and comparison testing. Platelet reactivity was assessed using light transmission aggregometry and P-selectin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor expression was assessed using flow cytometry. Thrombelastography was used to measure clot strength, clotting time, and fibrinogen activity. Serum cholesterol, C-reactive protein, complete blood count, and comprehensive metabolic panel were also measured. RESULTS: Platelet reactivity did not differ among menopausal states or hormone levels. Clotting time was increased in postmenopausal women (6.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.8 ± 1.2 min, P = 0.013) and significantly correlated with estradiol levels (r = 0.68, P < 0.001). A significantly higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was observed in postmenopausal women (P = 0.05). Mean C-reactive protein levels were numerically higher in the postmenopausal group. CONCLUSIONS: The thrombotic risk profile between premenopausal and postmenopausal women is similar. However, improved management of cholesterol may be of clinical benefit. Large-scale studies are required to validate these findings.

Role of genotype-based personalized antiplatelet therapy in the era of potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitors.

Therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, commonly known as dual antiplatelet therapy, is a widely adapted secondary prevention strategy among coronary artery disease patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. However, in addition to response variability and high on-treatment platelet reactivity and their relation to increased adverse events during clopidogrel therapy, candidate gene studies and genome-wide association studies have highlighted the significance of single nucleotide polymorphisms of genes associated with clopidogrel metabolism in coronary artery disease patients. Genotyping may have an emerging role in personalized antiplatelet therapy, particularly with the advent of new P2Y12 receptor blockers that have more rapid and potent pharmacodynamic properties than clopidogrel. The current review discusses the role of genotyping in personalizing P2Y12 receptor-blocker therapy.

Usefulness of the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to evaluate the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel therapies.

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed the antiplatelet effects of different P2Y(12) receptor blockers with VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VN-P2Y12) and light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). BACKGROUND: The point-of-care VN-P2Y12 has been used to assess the antiplatelet effects in clopidogrel-treated patients but has not been evaluated in detail in patients treated with ticagrelor. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either ticagrelor [180 mg loading/90 mg twice daily (n = 37)] or clopidogrel [600 mg loading/75 mg daily (n = 39)] on top of aspirin treatment, and platelet reactivity was measured serially during onset, maintenance, and offset phases. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as 5 and 20 µM adenosine diphosphate-induced maximal platelet aggregation ≥46% and ≥59%, respectively, and P2Y12 reaction units ≥235. RESULTS: Platelet function measured by VN-P2Y12 correlated well with LTA (.812 ≤ ρ ≤ .823, P < .001). VN-P2Y12 "BASE" values were consistent during administration of both agents. Calculated and reported percent inhibitions by VN-P2Y12 were similar (difference, -0.6%; 95% agreement limits, -22.9% to 21.6%). Platelet inhibition by VN-P2Y12 during clopidogrel and ticagrelor administrations was comparable to platelet inhibition by LTA. HPR determined by LTA and VN-P2Y12 were well matched, and the risk stratification between the two methods showed strong agreement after both therapies (κ > .7). CONCLUSIONS: The VerifyNow P2Y12 assay is effective in assessing the antiplatelet effects and in identifying HPR during clopidogrel or ticagrelor therapy.

Platelet function measurement-based strategy to reduce bleeding and waiting time in clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the timing based on platelet function strategy to reduce clopidogrel-associated bleeding related to CABG (TARGET-CABG) study.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin and clopidogrel therapy is associated with a variable bleeding risk in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). We evaluated the role of platelet function testing in clopidogrel-treated patients undergoing CABG. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred eighty patients on background aspirin with/without clopidogrel therapy undergoing elective first time isolated on-pump CABG were enrolled in a prospective single-center, nonrandomized, unblinded investigation (Timing Based on Platelet Function Strategy to Reduce Clopidogrel-Associated Bleeding Related to CABG [TARGET-CABG] study) between September 2008 and January 2011. Clopidogrel responsiveness (ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength [MA(ADP)]) was determined by thrombelastography; CABG was done within 1 day, 3-5 days, and >5 days in patients with an MA(ADP) >50 mm, 35-50 mm, and <35 mm, respectively. The primary end point was 24-hour chest tube drainage and key secondary end point was total number of transfused red blood cells. Equivalence was defined as ≤25% difference between groups. ANCOVA was used to adjust for confounders. Mean 24-hour chest tube drainage in clopidogrel-treated patients was 93% (95% confidence interval, 81-107%) of the amount observed in clopidogrel-naive patients, and the total amount of red blood cells transfused did not differ between groups (1.80 U versus 2.08 U, respectively, P=0.540). The total waiting period in clopidogrel-treated patients was 233 days (mean, 2.7 days per patient). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy based on preoperative platelet function testing to determine the timing of CABG in clopidogrel-treated patients was associated with the same amount of bleeding observed in clopidogrel-naive patients and ≈50% shorter waiting time than recommended in the current guidelines. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00857155.

Adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength: a new thrombelastographic indicator of long-term poststenting ischemic events.

BACKGROUND: Poststenting ischemic events occur despite dual-antiplatelet therapy, suggesting that a "one size fits all" antithrombotic strategy has significant limitations. Ex vivo platelet function measurements may facilitate risk stratification and personalized antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: We investigated the prognostic utility of the strength of adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced (MA(ADP)) and thrombin-induced (MA(THROMBIN)) platelet-fibrin clots measured by thrombelastography and ADP-induced light transmittance aggregation (LTA(ADP)) in 225 serial patients after elective stenting treated with aspirin and clopidogrel. Ischemic and bleeding events were assessed over 3 years. RESULTS: Overall, 59 (26%) first ischemic events occurred. Patients with ischemic events had higher MA(ADP), MA(THROMBIN), and LTA(ADP) (P < .0001 for all comparisons). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, MA(ADP) >47 mm had the best predictive value of long-term ischemic events compared with other measurements (P < .0001), with an area under the curve = 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.89, P < .0001). The univariate Cox proportional hazards model identified MA(ADP) >47 mm, MA(THROMBIN) >69 mm, and LTA(ADP) >34% as significant independent predictors of first ischemic events at the 3-year time point, with hazard ratios of 10.3 (P < .0001), 3.8 (P < .0001), and 4.8 (P < .0001), respectively. Fifteen bleeding events occurred. Receiver operating characteristic curve and quartile analysis suggests MA(ADP)

Response to ticagrelor in clopidogrel nonresponders and responders and effect of switching therapies: the RESPOND study.

BACKGROUND: The antiplatelet effects of the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial dose of ticagrelor in patients nonresponsive to clopidogrel and after they switch agents are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with stable coronary artery disease on aspirin therapy received a 300-mg clopidogrel load; nonresponders were identified by light transmittance aggregometry. In a 2-way crossover design, nonresponders (n=41) and responders (n=57) randomly received clopidogrel (600 mg/75 mg once daily) or ticagrelor (180 mg/90 mg twice daily) for 14 days during period 1. In period 2, all nonresponders switched treatment; half of the responders continued the same treatment, whereas the others switched treatment. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was higher in nonresponders treated with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel (P<0.05). Treatment with ticagrelor among nonresponders resulted in a >10%, >30%, and >50% decrease in platelet aggregation from baseline in 100%, 75%, and 13% of patients, respectively. Platelet aggregation fell from 59+/-9% to 35+/-11% in patients switched from clopidogrel to ticagrelor and increased from 36+/-14% to 56+/-9% in patients switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel (P<0.0001 for both). Platelet reactivity was below the cut points previously associated with ischemic risk measured by light transmittance aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y(12) assay, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation in 98% to 100% of patients after ticagrelor therapy versus 44% to 76% of patients after clopidogrel therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor therapy overcomes nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel, and its antiplatelet effect is the same in responders and nonresponders. Nearly all clopidogrel nonresponders and responders treated with ticagrelor will have platelet reactivity below the cut points associated with ischemic risk. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifier: NCT00642811.

Antiplatelet effects of aspirin with phytosterols: comparison with non-enteric coated aspirin alone.

The novel combination of aspirin and phytosterols may be a potential strategy to treat patients with cardiovascular disease. We sought to determine if the antiplatelet effects of a combination caplet of 81 mg aspirin with 400 mg phytosterols differed from the antiplatelet effects of non-enteric coated aspirin. The first five days of aspirin therapy alone (T1) produced marked reductions in collagen-induced, ADP-induced, and archidonic acid- induced platelet aggregation, and in serum and urine TxB(2) compared to baseline. Five days after randomization to aspirin alone versus aspirin+phytosterols (T2), there were no differences in any measurement of platelet function within each group compared to T1 or between groups. The present study suggests that the antiplatelet effect of non-enteric coated 81 mg twice-daily aspirin therapy alone is not affected by the addition of phytosterols in a combination product.

Randomized double-blind assessment of the ONSET and OFFSET of the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: the ONSET/OFFSET study.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist. This is the first study to compare the onset and offset of platelet inhibition (IPA) with ticagrelor using the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) trial loading dose (180 mg) with a high loading dose (600 mg) of clopidogrel. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, 123 patients with stable coronary artery disease who were taking aspirin therapy (75 to 100 mg/d) received ticagrelor (180-mg load, 90-mg BID maintenance dose [n=57]), clopidogrel (600-mg load, 75-mg/d maintenance dose [n=54]), or placebo (n=12) for 6 weeks. Greater IPA (20 micromol/L ADP, final extent) occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after loading and at 6 weeks (P<0.0001 for all); by 2 hours after loading, a greater proportion of patients achieved >50% IPA (98% versus 31%, P<0.0001) and >70% IPA (90% versus 16%, P<0.0001) in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group, respectively. A faster offset occurred with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel (4-to-72-hour slope [% IPA/h] -1.04 versus -0.48, P<0.0001). At 24 hours after the last dose, mean IPA was 58% for ticagrelor versus 52% for clopidogrel (P=NS). IPA for ticagrelor on day 3 after the last dose was comparable to clopidogrel at day 5; IPA on day 5 for ticagrelor was similar to clopidogrel on day 7 and did not differ from placebo (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor achieved more rapid and greater platelet inhibition than high-loading-dose clopidogrel; this was sustained during the maintenance phase and was faster in offset after drug discontinuation.

The relation between platelet reactivity and glycemic control in diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease on maintenance aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.

BACKGROUND: High platelet reactivity (HPR) during aspirin and clopidogrel therapy in patients with diabetes has been reported and may affect outcomes. However, the relation of platelet reactivity to glycemic control is less studied in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: Platelet aggregation (PA) in response to 5 and 20 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was compared in type 2 diabetic (n = 36) and nondiabetic patients (n = 35) undergoing elective stenting on aspirin and clopidogrel maintenance therapy. The relation of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) <7 g/dL (n = 16) and HbA(1c) > or =7 g/dL (n = 20) on PA was examined. High platelet reactivity was defined as >46% for 5 micromol/L ADP-induced and >59% for 20 micromol/L ADP-induced PA. RESULTS: Diabetic patients had higher 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP-induced PA than nondiabetic patients (45 +/- 17 vs 33 +/- 12, P = .009 and 52 +/- 19 vs 40 +/- 12, P = .004, respectively). Diabetic patients with HbA(1c) > or =7.0 g/dL had significantly higher 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP-induced PA versus patients with diabetes with HbA(1c) <7.0 g/dL (54 +/- 15 vs 34 +/- 14, P < .001 and 62 +/- 14 vs 40 +/- 17, P < .001, respectively). Among diabetic patients with HbA(1c) > or =7 g/dL, the prevalence of HPR was 65% and 60%; and among diabetic patients with HbA(1c) <7 g/dL, the prevalence of HPR was 19% and 13% as measured by 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP-induced PA, respectively. A correlation was present between 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP-induced PA and HbA(1c) (r = 0.60 and 0.62, P = .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: An important relation exists between glycemic control and platelet reactivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. Poorly controlled patients with diabetes have the greatest platelet reactivity and may require alternative antiplatelet strategies, and further clinical investigations are warranted.

Recent developments in clopidogrel pharmacology and their relation to clinical outcomes.

Oral antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is an important and widely prescribed strategy to prevent ischemic events in patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, the occurrence of thrombotic events including stent thrombosis is still high (> 10%). Current practice guidelines are mainly based on large-scale trials focusing on clinical endpoints and 'one size fits all' strategies of treating all patients with the same clopidogrel doses. Pharmacodynamic studies have demonstrated that the latter strategy is associated with wide response variability where a substantial percentage of patients show nonresponsivenes. Translational research studies have established the relation between clopidogrel nonresponsivenes or high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adverse clinical events, thereby establishing clopidogrel nonresponsivenes as an important emerging clinical entity. Clopidogrel response variability is primarily a pharmacokinetic phenomenon associated with insufficient active metabolite generation that is secondary to i) limited intestinal absorption affected by an ABCB1 gene polymorphism; ii) functional variability in P450 isoenzyme activity; and iii) a genetic polymorphism of CYP450 isoenzymes. Personalized antiplatelet treatment with higher clopidogrel doses in selected patients or with newer more potent P2Y(12) receptor blockers based on individual platelet function measurement can overcome some of the limitations of current clopidogrel treatment.

Effect of long-term clopidogrel treatment on platelet function and inflammation in patients undergoing coronary arterial stenting.

A clopidogrel loading dose administered during stenting attenuates inflammation marker release. However, less is known of the anti-inflammatory effect of clopidogrel maintenance therapy. Platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate and inflammation markers were measured in 110 consecutive patients (69 clopidogrel-naive patients and 41 patients receiving long-term clopidogrel therapy for >6 months) before nonemergent stenting by turbidimetric aggregometry and flow cytometry and multianalyte profiling, respectively. All patients were treated with aspirin. Prestenting adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, P-selectin, and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa expression were lower in patients receiving long-term clopidogrel therapy compared with the clopidogrel-naive group (p <0.001), accompanied by lower levels of selected inflammation markers (p < or = 0.05). Additionally, there were strong correlations between platelet aggregation and flow cytometric measurements (p < or = 0.04) and between specific inflammation markers (p < or = 0.02). In conclusion, in addition to markedly lowering platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate, long-term clopidogrel therapy is associated with an anti-inflammatory effect.

Bivalirudin and clopidogrel with and without eptifibatide for elective stenting: effects on platelet function, thrombelastographic indexes, and their relation to periprocedural infarction results of the CLEAR PLATELETS-2 (Clopidogrel with Eptifibatide to Arrest the Reactivity of Platelets) study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to compare the effect of therapy with bivalirudin alone versus bivalirudin plus eptifibatide on platelet reactivity measured by turbidometric aggregometry and thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (TIP-FCS) measured by thrombelastography in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients. The secondary aim was to study the relation of platelet aggregation and TIP-FCS to the occurrence of periprocedural infarction. BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is commonly administered alone to clopidogrel naïve (CN) patients and to patients on maintenance clopidogrel therapy (MT) undergoing elective stenting. The effect of adding eptifibatide to bivalirudin on platelet reactivity (PR) and TIP-FCS, and their relation to periprocedural infarction in these patients are unknown. METHODS: Patients (n = 200) stratified to clopidogrel treatment status were randomly treated with bivalirudin (n = 102) or bivalirudin plus eptifibatide (n = 98). One hundred twenty-eight CN patients were loaded with 600 mg clopidogrel immediately after stenting, and 72 MT patients were not loaded. The PR, TIP-FCS, and myonecrosis markers were serially determined. RESULTS: In CN and MT patients, bivalirudin plus eptifibatide was associated with markedly lower PR at all times (5- and 20-microM adenosine diphosphate-induced, and 15- and 25-microM thrombin receptor activator peptide-induced aggregation; p < 0.001 for all) and reduced mean TIP-FCS (p < 0.05). Patients who had a periprocedural infarction had higher mean 18-h PR (p < 0.0001) and TIP-FCS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: For elective stenting, the addition of eptifibatide to bivalirudin lowered PR to multiple agonists and the tensile strength of the TIP-FCS, 2 measurements strongly associated with periprocedural myonecrosis. Future studies of PR and TIP-FCS for elective stenting may facilitate personalized antiplatelet therapy and enhance the selection of patients for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade. (Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction, Platelet Reactivity, Thrombin Generation, and Clot Strength: Differential Effects of Eptifibatide + Bivalirudin Versus Bivalirudin [CLEAR PLATELETS-2]; NCT00370045.